Get 69% Off on Cloud Hosting : Claim Your Offer Now!
Server
Colocation
CDN
Network
Linux
Cloud Hosting
VMware
Public Cloud
Multi-Cloud
Hosting
Cloud
Server Hosting
Kubernetes
Table of Contents
If you have been exploring NVIDIA’s data center GPUs, you have probably come across both the H100 and the newer H200.
At first glance, they look very similar. Both are built on NVIDIA’s Hopper architecture and target AI training, inference, and high-performance computing.
But once you start digging into the specifications, the differences begin to matter.
Memory capacity changes, bandwidth improvements, and workload performance are not identical between the two.
Some gains are obvious on paper, while others only show up in real-world AI and HPC use cases.
So instead of comparing model names alone, you need to understand where the H200 actually improves on the H100 and what that means for your workloads.
Here is a clear breakdown of the key differences between the NVIDIA H100 GPU and NVIDIA H200 GPU.
The GPU H100 was NVIDIA’s flagship Hopper GPU, replacing the A100 gpu and setting a new standard for large-scale AI training and inference. It quickly became the backbone of modern AI clusters, including NVIDIA DGX H100 systems and cloud offerings like Azure ND H100 v5.
The GPU H200 is not a brand-new architecture. Instead, it is an evolution of the H100, designed to remove memory bottlenecks that appear in large language models, recommendation systems, and data-heavy HPC simulations.
In short, H100 focuses on raw compute leadership, while H200 pushes memory capacity and bandwidth to better support today’s massive models.

Both NVIDIA H100 and NVIDIA H200 are based on the Hopper architecture and support the same core technologies:
When it comes to compute, the similarities are striking. The H100 CUDA cores, Tensor Cores, and overall instruction set remain largely unchanged in H200. This means that for compute-bound workloads, performance gains are incremental rather than dramatic.
The key architectural difference lies not in compute units, but in how fast data can move to and from memory.
|
Feature |
NVIDIA H100 GPU |
NVIDIA H200 GPU |
|
GPU Architecture |
Hopper |
Hopper (Enhanced) |
|
GPU Name Usage |
GPU H100, H100 GPU |
GPU H200, H200 GPU |
|
Memory Type |
HBM3 |
HBM3e |
|
Memory Capacity |
80GB |
Higher than H100 (HBM3e-based) |
|
Memory Bandwidth |
High |
Significantly higher than H100 |
|
CUDA Cores |
Same Hopper-based H100 CUDA cores |
Similar core count as H100 |
|
AI Precision Support |
FP8, FP16, TF32 |
FP8, FP16, TF32 |
|
Transformer Engine |
Supported |
Supported |
|
NVLink / NVSwitch |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Primary Advantage |
Strong compute performance |
Memory bandwidth & capacity |
|
Ideal Workloads |
AI training, inference, HPC |
Large LLMs, memory-bound AI |
|
Cloud Availability |
Widely available (Azure ND H100 v5) |
Limited but growing |
|
Typical Pricing |
Lower than H200 |
Higher due to newer memory |
|
Price Comparison |
H100 GPU price is more stable |
H200 GPU price carries premium |
|
Upgrade Value |
Major step up from A100 |
Best for memory-constrained models |
This is where H100 vs H200 becomes a meaningful discussion.
The standard NVIDIA H100 typically ships with 80GB of HBM3 memory. While this is already substantial, large AI models quickly expose memory limitations, especially during training and fine-tuning.
The NVIDIA H200 upgrades this by introducing HBM3e memory, significantly increasing both capacity and bandwidth.
For organizations running trillion-parameter models or memory-heavy inference pipelines, H200 can deliver noticeable efficiency gains even when raw compute remains similar.
In real-world benchmarks, H200 vs H100 performance depends heavily on workload type.
For AI inference at scale, H200 reduces latency spikes caused by memory stalls. In HPC simulations, faster memory access improves throughput in data-intensive scenarios.
If you are upgrading from A100, both H100 and H200 represent a major leap. But if you already run H100 clusters, the value of H200 depends on how memory-constrained your workloads are.
Pricing is often the deciding factor.
The NVIDIA H100 price varies widely depending on region, form factor, and deployment model. On-premises buyers may look at the H100 GPU price, while cloud users focus on per-hour costs.
Typical pricing considerations include:
The NVIDIA H100 vs H200 price gap reflects the newer memory technology in H200. H200 commands a premium, especially in early availability phases.
For enterprises purchasing full systems, NVIDIA DGX H100 price and future DGX H200 system pricing become relevant. These systems bundle networking, cooling, and software, which significantly affects total cost.
Many teams do not buy GPUs outright. Instead, they rely on cloud platforms.
Microsoft Azure offers Azure ND H100 v5 instances, which are widely used for AI training and inference.
Key pricing considerations include:
Azure ND H100 v5 documentation provides details on GPU count, memory, and networking. For teams evaluating cost efficiency, Azure ND H100 v5 pricing per hour often determines whether workloads remain in the cloud or move on-prem.
As of now, H200 cloud availability is more limited, but H200 GPU instances and rental options are gradually emerging. Over time, expect H200 cloud server pricing models similar to H100, but at a higher hourly rate.
H100 remains a strong choice for most AI training pipelines and general HPC workloads.
H200 makes the most sense when memory efficiency directly affects performance and cost.
The H100 vs H200 comparison is not about which GPU is “better” in absolute terms.
The NVIDIA H100 GPU delivers exceptional compute performance and remains the most widely deployed Hopper GPU across enterprises and cloud providers.
The NVIDIA H200 GPU cloud server refines that foundation by addressing one of the biggest challenges in modern AI: memory bandwidth and capacity.
If your workloads struggle with memory limits, H200 offers tangible benefits. If compute is your primary concern, H100 continues to provide excellent value, especially when factoring in availability, cloud pricing, and ecosystem maturity.
Ultimately, the right choice depends on your workload profile, budget, and deployment strategy—not just the model number on the GPU.
Join the Cloud Movement, today!
© Cyfuture, All rights reserved.
Send this to a friend